Tuesday, June 29, 2010

How Facebook Made My Phone Less Useful


Last year, at upgrade time on my Verizon Wireless account, I bought the HTC ERIS Android phone (full disclosure: uses the Google Android OS, and this blog is on Blogger, a Google site). Neat little handheld computer. Problem is it's not a great phone. Don't get me started.

Even so, as I used one of its features to indicate my favorite connections from my contact list, it populated a widget with the names and photos of these people. On each one I could assign a default action. Plus, by providing my Facebook identity for another Android feature, the widget would search my Facebook friends and, if one of my favorites was there, would retreive their profile picture from the Facebook page. Sw-ee-t!

About two months ago, HTC put out an upgrade for the Android system, going from OS 1.x to 2.1. Among the many changes it implemented was the erasure of all the favorites in the widget. As I patiently revisited each connection, I noticed that the Facebook pix were not appearing. I reset my account data. Still no pix. In fact, many of the Facebook-accessing features had been eliminated. Curious, but I erroneously blamed the HTC Android update.

Then, last week, I read on Andy Beal's Marketing Pilgrim about Facebook blocking a recent Twitter tool. The item details a lawsuit that reveals Facebook's assertion that its terms of service have the force of law by defining data access to individual accounts by third-party applications.

This is not the place to argue the relative merits of Facebook's terms, that's being done many other places, including at the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. (I touched on it over a year ago here.) However, this much is clear to me: Facebook has made my phone less useful by blocking the software program I was using to link to information about my closest connections.

From the marketing perspective, this seems counter-intuitive. It's pretty obvious that much of the value of the internet and wireless networks over the last decade has been in driving out obstacles to the sharing of information. In fact, it can be argued that the fluidity of the information system is one of the prevailing forces behind greater business and personal productivity, which has been a significant and positive economic influence during the past two years of recession.

Now comes Facebook, with global domination aspirations (see Peter Shankman's comment below), damming up the information flow as a business model. Could be that they intend to introduce their own Android app and want to protect that market space. However, because the gates are closing even to worldwide networks like Twitter, there is little doubt to Facebook's ultimate intention to own and control every bit of your life and social behavior inside its electronic walls. Beware of the illusion of transparency that Facebook attempts to hold out as a benefit. They're rapidly displaying the type of tyranny that steals your identity and sells it off to the highest bidders.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

A Shrinking Social Landscape?

The Wall Street Journal today covered the throw off of Bebo by AOL, a capitulation to the accelerating consolidation of the online social space (which I comment on here). Soon, there may just be one online social network, and it's name will be Facebook, according to Peter Shankman, founder of Help A Reporter Out ("HARO"). Peter, whose wit and candor is legendary, pointed out the other night that both the time and effort necessary to thread together the various parts and passions in one's life and the need for immediate and viral viewing and sharing of all things personal demand the utility reside in a single interface. Facebook is the only one with the momentum and scale to accomplish this, according to his view, at least in the English-speaking world.

It was my privilege to serve on a panel with Peter and Spencer Baretz of Hellerman Baretz Communications this week in New York for the Law Firm Media Professionals (see below). Frankly, I don't know why I was invited to this party, except for the fact that I happen to work for a law firm that has embraced social media at the core of its marketing and business development campaigns. I possess neither the irrefutable creative experience of Mr. Baretz nor the dynamic vision of Mr. Shankman.

My hat's off to both of them. We know where Peter stands. If you had to confine your online social networking activity to a single channel, would it be Facebook? Why? Why not?

Monday, June 14, 2010

Hey, Big Apple.

Thanks to Joshua Peck and the Law Firm Media Professionals, I'll be in New York City briefly tomorrow and Wednesday talking about the online social media plan at my employer, Sands Anderson PC.

I've covered a bit of this information before (here and here) and will be on the panel with Peter Shankman and John Hellerman (or a stand-in, if John's a third-time daddy). Concentrating on actual activity and value for reaching media contacts and other stakeholders, we will try to throw a little more light on the fast-developing strategies and ever-changing landscape for lawyers among the online social utilities. Maybe I'll see you there.

The official word:

The LFMP event is from 7-9pm in New York featuring social media panelists Peter Shankman of Help A Reporter Out (HARO), L. Russell Lawson of Sands Anderson, and John Hellerman of Hellerman Baretz Communications LLC.

When: Tuesday, June 15th , 2010, 7-9 pm

Where: Paul Weiss, at 1285 Sixth Avenue (at 51st Street in the UBS Building).

Note: The Sixth Ave. entrance closes at 6 PM, so enter on 51st St. adjacent to Heartland Brewery. Take the escalator to lower level, there will be someone there to greet you.

Thanks again to Paul Weiss, and Madelaine Miller and Rebeccca Lojo for hosting us.

Wednesday, June 09, 2010

Great Jakes. Great Scott!


The Daily Planet's Perry White used to exclaim "Great Scott!" whenever he was surprised or amazed, by Clark Kent, Lois Lane, Superman. I was amazed while talking to Robert Algeri of Great Jakes yesterday.

#1: Robert had called to ask me my opinion of a new idea in Web sites that his company was starting to introduce. He had listened in to my Twitter stream, looked at my LinkedIn profile, checked out the blog, seen what I was up to at my law firm. Made him think well of me. Reputation development through social media. Amazing.

#2: Robert's company has reimagined the legal Web site at the most personal level: the reputation of the lawyer. What does a visitor want to know about a lawyer, what are the characteristics of experience and skill that persuade action for further communication, what are the conversation starters? Some commonalities? Yes. Some unique identifiers? Yes. How can these be organized for complete transparency and customization? Great Jakes calls it the Rainmaker Focused Web site. Amazing.

In truth, there's nothing you can do to the facts of a lawyer's background that has not already been done. Cases, articles, testimonials, social media, yadda, yadda. Here is the Great Jakes breakthrough: every lawyer can assume the rainmaker mantle. Because the styling of the Great Jakes site allows for every part of a lawyer's reputational array, whether deep and bet-the-company, or niched and long tail, to be conveniently accessed and effectively displayed.

No more "my resume trumps your resume" battles on length and complexity. Each lawyer becomes their own Web site, in essence. And each can display what makes them unique, without compromising the brand message of the overall Web appearance of the firm.

Great scott! What would your lawyers say to their own Web site?